Michelle Obama has taken a moment out of her caviar commie lifestyle to lecture us all about slandering all of her good friends in the rioting class. Would it surprise you to learn we’re all ‘racist’ yet again?
Seriously y’all, it’s time to find yourselves a new word. But as you’ll see, there’s a big-picture REASON they stick to their threadbare ‘raaaaa-cism’ narrative.
But first, ICYMI here’s Michelle Obama popping off about how the right mischaracterizes the left’s riots.
Michelle Obama claims the Antifa/BLM riots weren't violent. 🤡 pic.twitter.com/OxDIComwCp
— Steven Ertelt (@StevenErtelt) September 3, 2026
The video clips running alongside her statements ought to be enough to falsify her claims. But since the left isn’t great about ‘subtle’, let’s hammer it home a little.
Let’s break down that one-minute-nineteen-second slice of lunacy point by point.
The assertions:
1) Stoking fears about black-and-brown Americans.
2) Lying about how minorities will destroy the suburbs
3) Whipping up violence and intimidation
4) and pinning it all on what’s been an overwhelmingly peaceful movement for racial solidarity
5) It’s true! research backs it up. Only a tiny fraction of demonstrations had any violence at all
6) What Trump is doing false/wrong/racist
7) lecture about fear, misinformation and fact-checking, and spreading lies to win
ClashDaily Replies
1) (a) we don’t claim black-and-brown Americans were the problem. Rioters were the problem. Many of the Antifa regulars were bored rich white kids trying to find meaning in their otherwise nihilistic worldviews. We’re glad they were arrested too.
(b) Have you noticed the pivot to ‘black-and-brown’ yet? They have to make that pivot, because the more they flood the zone with illegal aliens from Latin America, the smaller the voice of the African-American voting block becomes. If they lump them together in one block, Dems are hoping you won’t notice that the specific concerns and interests of that group are going to be swallowed up by an increasingly distant and disinterested movement. (See also how the LGBT ‘coalition’ kicked Martina Navratilova out of the movement when she refused to bow the knee to the new enthusiasm for Trans)
2) Lying about how minorities will destroy the suburbs? Again. Not ‘minorities’, so much as lawless criminals encouraged to riot, of any color. See Seattle, Portland, Kenosha, among other examples.
3) Whipping up violence and intimidation? When her husband was President, law enforcement in Dallas was giving a proper police escort to a duly-organized and permitted BLM parade, at the end of which, a racist with a rifle started picking off police officers. His affiliations were with some groups supported by the same subversive Cuban spy agency that was in bed with the Weather Underground, whose founders launched Obama’s campaign in their living room. (See report here)
4) ‘Overwhelmingly peaceful movement’ — as mentioned in point 3, leaders of these protest are closely tied to Cuban subversive operatives, with a long history of fomenting actual violent domestic terrorist movements, including kidnappings, bombings, and various other acts of violence, with the end-goal of fomenting a violent revolution in America. The ‘racial solidarity’ has been chosen specifically for the way grievances can be stoked and unhealthy passions can be inflamed.
5) Tiny fraction… any violence at all? Portland had one HUNDRED consecutive days of rioting, with leftist activist groups bailing them out of jail so they could continue rioting, and Kamala encouraged mass bail-outs which was used to let a great many criminals walk free, even when their crimes had nothing to do with the ‘protests’, in some cases further endangering the people they had victimized in the first place.
The George Floyd riots resulted in several dozen deaths, from 25-42, by some estimates. For the record, the total number of unarmed black men killed in a police encounter
6) This isn’t a statement of fact, this is a narrative you use to whip up emotion among your own electorate, just like the death of democracy blather, frothing-at-the-mouth claims of what pro-life laws will look like, and even some crazy claims that Clarence Thomas will overturn inter-racial marriage. (Which would be really awkward both for himself — his wife is white — and for the Veep.)
7) This entire video is an example of her side doing exactly that. Just like we saw Abigail Spanberger as the ‘moderate’ candidate, Joe Biden as ‘sharp as a tack’, and that we need to ‘believe the science’.
Go sell crazy someplace else, Michelle.
We’re already dealing with about as much as we can handle already.
