The coming year is fixing to feature all impeachments all the time. And if you think they’re just guys at the top like Hegseth… guess again!
Remember those ‘seditious six’? They’re back… with a vengeance.
For most of us, today is a day where we take time out to reflect on the sacrifices of those who made the decision to participate in our military, to sacrifice the comforts of home so many of us take for granted, and stand between us and dangerous men, usually on some unfamiliar part of the planet.
They chose — chose — to serve the country, and we are grateful for that service.
Well, most of us are. Others would rather use the military as a piñata to kick around for political grandstanding — no matter who gets hurt in the process. They’re going to start with Hegseth, but don’t expect them to stop there.
Q) Chuck Schumer said yesterday that he wants to put you on trial. Are you expecting this in the next Congress…
@SECWAR) “It’s what happens when you put people’s ideological agendas in charge of institutions.” https://t.co/haAysMHykW
— DOW Rapid Response (@DOWResponse) November 10, 2026
Not surprisingly, Massie was the first to take a swing at the Trump admin on his way out the door, wasting some of the little remaining valuable House Floor time in a vote on impeaching Pete Hegseth. That he failed was predictable. That he was the only one in his party to support it was telling.
The disgruntled, ousted congressman’s attempt to impeach Secretary Hegseth has FAILED! https://t.co/z04h3lmCfB
— DOW Rapid Response (@DOWResponse) November 10, 2026
If he truly had the courage of his convictions, Massie would have named the ACTUAL target of his angst: the president himself. But no dice. He’ll have to content himself with letting whichever Dem takes Jeffries’ job organize those tedious Pelosi impeachment reruns.
Besides it’s not about ‘impeachment’ in the strict use of the term, that a violation of the oath of office has occurred and the office-holder needs to be held to account. It’s explicitly vindictive, as Professor Turley has explained in a series of tweets (emphasis added):
Rep. Jason Crow (D., Co.) just told Martha McCallum that the impeachment of Hegseth is “not really about impeachment” but rather just a desire to remove him. He said that this is just another means. That is precisely what the Framers did not want impeachment to become…
…Rep. Crow is speaking of impeachment as a way of forcing “a course change.” It is exactly the cavalier attitude toward impeachment that can be so destabilizing for our country…
…He added “we have a tool called impeachment” that allows them to remove cabinet members like Hegseth if the President will not do so. When Martha pushed him on such “amorphous” objections, Crow said, “I would love to end the impeachment proceedings…just fire Pete Hegseth.“
But even the Dems themselves can’t come to any agreement on who they’re actually mad at, and who the real targets of their actions are.
Funny, your fellow Democrat, Rep. Yassamin Ansari, is currently threatening to go after our service members…
This impeachment is a FARCE. https://t.co/w1CX3hirut
— DOW Rapid Response (@DOWResponse) November 10, 2026
Neither Trump or Hegseth seem to be running scared from the latest round of impeachment proceedings.
